http://english.pravda.ru/topic/korea-285/
Ο Αμερικανος Μπολτον στο ψυφισμα στον ΟΗΕ χαρακτηρησε τους Κορεατες σαν τον Χρουστοφ οταν ειπε ο αντιπροσοπως της Βορειας Κορεας οτι εαν παρθουν δυνατα μετρα κατα την χωρα θα παρουν στρατιωτικα αντιποινα και μετα αποχωρησε απο την συνεδριαση και ειπε οτι ο μεγαλυτερος κινδυνος για την ανθρωποτητα ειναι η ΗΠΑ...
New York Times
But China's refusal to take part in searches, and Russia's seeming
annoyance at the end of the process, immediately raised questions
about how effective the resolution's execution could be. And it raised
the prospect, too, that similar action sought by the United States
against Iran could face a much tougher battle.
After the vote, John R. Bolton, the American ambassador, insisted that
China was bound by the resolution's terms and would have to find a way
to comply with the inspection provision. "I can't believe that China
won't adhere to obligations that the Security Council has imposed," he
said.
Ambassador Pak Gil-yon of North Korea told the Council that his
government "totally rejected" the resolution, and he accused the
panel's members of "gangster-like" action and a "double standards"
attitude that neglected the nuclear threat posed by the United States.
He said if the United States continued to "increase pressure" on North
Korea, his government would consider it a declaration of war and take
"critical countermeasures." He then rose from his guest seat at the
end of the horseshoe-shaped table and left.
Mr. Bolton asked to be heard and pointed to the empty chair, saying
Mr. Pak's impulsive departure was the equivalent of Khrushchev's
pounding his desk in protest in the General Assembly. The Russian
ambassador, Vitaly I. Churkin, complained that the reference, even at
a moment that he described as Mr. Bolton's "emotional state," was "an
inappropriate analogy."
http://english.pravda.ru/topic/korea-285/
No comments:
Post a Comment